ArticleThe Australasian journal of dermatology2026
Automated Melanocytic Lesion Classification: Capsule Networks Trained With Synthetic Images Can Outperform Networks Trained With Real Images.
Article in The Australasian journal of dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesConvolutional neural networks (CNNs) are known, due to inherent flaws in their design, to be subject to classification error. Many of these shortcomings in classification performance were addressed in 2017 with the introduction of capsule networks (CNs). The objective of this investigation is to determine the classification performance of a CN with respect to dermoscopic images of benign and atypical melanocytic lesions. We implement two kinds of training data for comparison: first, real images; and second, by utilising the CNs' autoencoder, a large number of synthetic images.
methods500 melanocytic lesion images (250 benign and 250 sufficiently atypical to warrant excision) were obtained from ISIC and PH2 Datasets. Images were randomly split equally for training and testing, and equally split between the classification categories. A CN was developed, trained and tested on these data. The CN was then trained on 3000 synthetic images (with an equal number of images in each classification category). The newly trained CN was then tested on the original test images.
resultsThe CN trained on the real images yielded a DOR (diagnostic odds ratio) of 51.0, a result which is comparable and, in many cases, superior to those reported for CNNs. The same CN trained on the synthetic images yielded a DOR of 71.3, a result which is significantly higher than the result obtained with real-image training.
conclusionsSince the effectiveness of automated melanocytic lesion image classification is limited by the difficulty in obtaining large numbers of high-quality training data, our results support the idea that training a classifier utilising synthetic images-where large numbers of quality images can be easily generated-is inherently advantageous. Given its advantages over a CNN, and trained on a very large number of synthetic images of melanocytic lesions, a CN classifier thus has the potential, only limited by computer resources, to yield previously unseen levels of generalisation performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.