Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41736161›Full record

ArticleHuman genomics2026

Enhancing prostate cancer diagnosis: a machine learning-based biomarker approach.

Patricia Porras-Quesada, Alberto Ramírez-Mena, Verónica Arenas-Rodríguez, Fernando Vázquez-Alonso, Jesús Alcalá-Fdez, Beatriz Álvarez-González, Luis Javier Martínez-González, María Jesús Álvarez-Cubero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Patricia Porras-Quesada *Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology III and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Health Sciences Technology Park (PTS), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Alberto Ramírez-Mena *IFMIF-DONES Spain Consortium, IFMIF-DONES, Granada, Spain.
Verónica Arenas-RodríguezDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology III and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Health Sciences Technology Park (PTS), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Fernando Vázquez-AlonsoUrology Department, University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Av. de las Fuerzas Armadas 2, Granada, Spain.
Jesús Alcalá-FdezDepartment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Andalusian Research Institute in Data Science and Computational Intelligence (DaSCI), University of Granada, Granada, 18071, Spain.
Beatriz Álvarez-GonzálezGENYO, Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research: Pfizer, Andalusian Regional Government; Health Sciences Technology Park (PTS), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Luis Javier Martínez-González *Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology III and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Health Sciences Technology Park (PTS), University of Granada, Granada, Spain. luisjavier.martinez@genyo.es.
María Jesús Álvarez-Cubero *Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology III and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Health Sciences Technology Park (PTS), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Funding

Carlos III Health Institute. TransMisiones 2023 PMPTA23/00025Ministry of Education FPU20/06611Ministry of Education FPU21/05808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe lack of reliable screening biomarkers for prostate cancer (PC) diagnosis makes tissue biopsy the gold-standard strategy. However, its frequent inconclusive results often lead to repeated procedures, increasing patient burden and healthcare costs. In this context, machine learning (ML) presents a novel approach for identifying gene signatures associated with tumor presence, offering a promising avenue for improved PC detection. Therefore, the present study explored the diagnostic potential of an ML-based gene signature and its applicability in tissue and plasma samples.

methodsThis study evaluated the clinical applicability of an ML-based algorithm developed using TCGA data (n = 608) and tested in an independent dataset (n = 349). The eleven candidate genes that contributed most to the predictive model were initially profiled by targeted RNA-Seq in prostate tissue validation cohort (n = 141) and further validated in replication tissue (n = 75) and plasma (n = 50) cohorts by qPCR and dPCR, respectively.

resultsGene expression analysis in prostate tissue led to the identification of a six-gene signature (DLX1, TDRD1, AMACR, HPN, HOXC6, and OR51E2) with high diagnostic performance (AUC = 95.9%). Expression patterns supported the gene signature’s potential to identify false-negative cases and correctly classify inconclusive biopsy results. In plasma, AMACR demonstrated added diagnostic value as a non-invasive biomarker when integrated with clinical parameters (AUC = 93.21%).

conclusionsThese findings demonstrate that our ML-based gene signature can accurately distinguish PC from non-tumoral tissue and resolve ambiguous biopsy results. Its integration alongside histopathology has the potential to reduce diagnostic uncertainty, improving PC early detection and guiding clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorMachine LearningProstatic NeoplasmsAlgorithmsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID41736161
PMCPMC13040917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.