Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41736112›Full record

ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2026

Understanding disparities in simulation through minority stress theory: a conceptual framework.

Remy Roe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Remy RoeDepartment of Graduate Medical Education, HCA Healthcare, HCA Florida St. Lucie Hospital, Port St. Lucie, FL, 34952, USA. remy.roe@hcahealthcare.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite growing attention to equity in healthcare simulation, persistent disparities in participation and learning outcomes among learners from minoritized backgrounds remain insufficiently explained. Existing simulation-based education frameworks describe how learning occurs but offer limited insight into how inequitable learning conditions shape learners’ experiences. We propose minority stress theory (MST) as a conceptual framework for understanding how stress related to minoritized identity operates within healthcare simulation environments. Originally developed to explain health disparities among sexual minorities, MST conceptualizes stress as arising from both structurally embedded conditions (distal stressors) and internalized vigilance and self-monitoring (proximal stressors). Through conceptual analysis, we map MST constructs onto core features of healthcare simulation, including its performance-based, socially intensive, evaluative, and immersive characteristics. We illustrate how minority stress processes may operate through education-relevant mechanisms, such as cognitive load, psychological safety, engagement, and help-seeking, to shape learning experiences and performance. By applying MST to simulation-based education, this paper offers an equity-informed framework for examining learning-environment mechanisms and informing inclusive simulation design, facilitation, and assessment practices.

Indexed as

DiversityEquityHealthcare simulationInclusionMinority stress

Identifiers

PMID41736112
PMCPMC13041096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.