ArticleAnimal microbiome2026
Faecal microbiome profiling uncovers putative biomarkers for piglets resilient to post-weaning diarrhoea.
Article in Animal microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An approach for diagnosis of diarrhea in neonatal piglets based on the core gut microbiota and machine learning.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPost-weaning diarrhoea (PWD) is a major health and economic concern in intensive pig production. In this study, we hypothesized that the faecal microbiome, sampled before disease onset, could provide early prognostic markers of PWD risk and applied a machine-learning framework to identify biomarkers predictive of piglet susceptibility or resilience to PWD. At two Danish commercial farms experiencing PWD outbreaks, four pens per farm were monitored for 14 days post-weaning, with daily clinical assessments and rectal swabs collected every other day. In a nested case–control design, we profiled 140 samples from 41 piglets that developed PWD and 82 samples from 16 piglets that remained healthy by 16S rRNA sequencing. Additionally, we performed shotgun metagenomics on 56 pre-diarrhoeic samples from susceptible piglets and 47 from resilient piglets. A random-forest classifier with recursive feature elimination identified metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) predictive of resilience or susceptibility, trained and cross-validated independently within each farm. Negative binomial zero-inflated mixed (NBZIM) models assessed associations with known PWD risk factors (e.g. birth/weaning weights, weaning age and dam parity).
resultsPrior to diarrhoea onset, microbial community structures differed significantly between resilient and susceptible piglets at both farms (PERMANOVA, p < 0.05). Feature-reduced models achieved high accuracy (AUC = 0.94 and 0.82 in Farm A and Farm B, respectively) and identified 10 and 13 MAGs enriched in resilient piglets, and one and two MAGs enriched in susceptible piglets from the two farms, respectively. All MAGs were farm-specific, highlighting the multifactorial aetiology of PWD. NBZIM models indicated that most predictive MAGs were independent of established PWD risk factors. Temporally, these MAGs peaked in relative abundance early after weaning (day 4 in Farm A; day 0 in Farm B). In the farm with unclear aetiology, functional analysis showed that susceptibility-associated MAGs were depleted for arginine/ornithine and vitamin (cobalamin, thiamine) biosynthesis and lactate production traits, suggesting metabolic dysbiosis.
conclusionsOur findings indicate that pre-diarrhoeic faecal microbiome signatures predict PWD risk and provide a foundation for early prognostic tools and targeted interventions, including probiotic development, to mitigate PWD and reduce reliance on antimicrobials in pig production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.