Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41735996›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2026

Roles and functioning of the European Union National Ethics Councils (NECs): a cross-sectional study.

Zvonimir Koporc, Edyta Sikorska, Livia Puljak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zvonimir KoporcSchool of Medicine, Catholic University of Croatia, Ilica 244, Zagreb, Croatia. zvonimir.koporc@unicath.hr.
Edyta SikorskaEuropean Commission, DG Research & Innovation, Research Ethics & Integrity Sector, Brussels, Belgium.
Livia PuljakCentre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Department of Nursing, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia.

Funding

Hrvatsko Katoličko Sveučilište EU National Ethics Councils (NEC) Survey
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn an increasingly globalised and technologically dynamic landscape, ethics councils and committees play a crucial role in navigating the complex ethical challenges posed by emerging technologies.

aimThis study examined the capacity and emerging approach of ethics councils and committees in the European Union (EU) to address those challenges by analysing their composition, functioning, financing, independence, and strategies for leveraging policy-relevance and uptake of their work (e.g., in the form of recommendations, advice, or opinions).

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study targeting the EU National Ethics Councils (NECs) that have participated in the National Ethics Councils Forum (NEC Forum) meetings over the last 10 years. The survey aimed to encompass eight thematic categories for NECs, with further questions targeted at council members, staff, and representatives.

resultsResponses were received from the National Ethics Councils (NECs) of 23 (85%) of the 27 EU countries. For some countries, more than one NEC responded to the survey. Findings revealed high heterogeneity in mandates and organizational procedures across EU NECs. Their independence is largely safeguarded by some legal act, and most of them operate without a formal obligation to consult governmental bodies before issuing opinions, and their positions generally cannot be revised by external entities. While most NECs are tasked with advising the government, parliaments, and public institutions, only a few NECs hold formal roles in legislative processes. Furthermore, some EU countries do not have an ethics body with an advisory mandate but rely on institutional structures for research ethics and research governance. Additionally, the study highlights persistent financial constraints and operational challenges of EU NECs, resulting in significant challenges to build critical levels of outreach and impact.

conclusionThis study sheds light on the institutional roles of ethics advisory bodies and related structures in the EU, their capacity to address the ethical dilemmas associated with technological advancements, and their role and contributions to relevant policy debates and decision-making. It further provides the background for promoting coordination, collaboration, and mutual learning among NECs in the EU, while also emphasizing the need for support of EU NECs to enhance their operational capacity and expertise, particularly in addressing ethical dilemmas associated with technological advancements as well as with new and emerging technologies.

Indexed as

Ethics CommitteesEuropean UnionCross-Sectional StudiesHumansCompositionsIndependenceNational Ethics Councils/Committees (NECs)OperabilityResearch ethicsSurvey

Identifiers

PMID41735996
PMCPMC13011714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.