ArticleBMC medical education2026
Global surgery teaching content in German universities: a mixed-method descriptive study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite increasing awareness of Global Surgery for surgeons worldwide for collaboration and exchange of resources with the final goal of making essential surgery available to all, only a few universities have included Global Surgery content in medical education. Ten years after the Lancet Commission report for Global Surgery, this descriptive study aimed to clarify the current status of teaching content on Global Surgery in German universities.
methodsIn a mixed-method approach, all medical faculties in Germany were evaluated via a survey and available information on existing courses to clarify the teaching content of Global Surgery in Global Health-related programs. Practical training was highlighted. Statistical analysis and comparative studies using the Pearson chi-square test between types of programs, regions, and universities were performed.
resultsOf the 45 universities, 36 (80%) offered one or several programs on Global Health, resulting in 81 programs, with the majority being Electives (n = 54; 66%). Global surgery content was included in seventeen universities (37%), including twenty-eight programs (34%), whereas four (14%) contained practical training. Educational hubs for Global Surgery seem to be Munich, Berlin, and Bonn. The reasons for the limited integration of Global Surgery in medical education are the current focus of programs and the lack of expertise and personnel.
conclusionMost universities have incorporated Global Health into German medical education, but Global Surgery remains insufficiently represented, with limited teaching, scarce practical training, and fragmented institutional structures. Coordinated national strategies are needed to strengthen faculty capacity, integrate Global Surgery into existing curricula, and expand collaborative opportunities to prepare future health-care professionals to address global surgical inequities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.