Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41735981›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2026

The associations of consultant sex on herding‑like prescribing behaviour: evidence from a web-based experiment with female primary care physicians in England.

Sandro Tiziano Stoffel, Matthias Schwenkglenks, Berna Cennet Özdemir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sandro Tiziano StoffelResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, London, UK. sandro.stoffel@unibas.ch.
Matthias SchwenkglenksInstitute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Berna Cennet ÖzdemirDepartment of Medical Oncology, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, InselspitalBern, Switzerland. berna.oezdemir@insel.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSex and gender influence medical decision making, yet little is known about how the sex of a consultant shapes the prescribing behaviour of female primary care physicians (PCPs). This study examined whether consultant sex affects female PCPs' likelihood of following recommendations that conflict with clinical guidelines and explored the factors underlying trust in consultants.

methodsWe conducted a web-based experimental study using case vignettes on sleeping medication and antibiotics. A total of 482 female PCPs in England were randomly assigned to conditions with no recommendation or with recommendations from male or female consultants. The outcomes included prescribing decisions, confidence, perceived difficulty, and effort.

resultsIn the absence of recommendations, female PCPs rarely prescribe non-guideline medications, reflecting cautious baseline behaviour. Consultant recommendations increased prescribing across both vignettes, with higher rates in both consultant conditions than in the control condition (sleeping medication: 43.3% male vs. 33.6% female vs. 30.4% control, χ

conclusionsConsultant recommendations, independent from consultant's sex, increased the likelihood of non-guideline prescribing among female PCPs. The absence of statistically significant differences between male and female consultants suggests that the presence of a recommendation itself may be more influential than consultant sex. Strengthening physicians' confidence and supporting guideline-based decision-making may help reduce susceptibility to social influence.

Indexed as

ConsultantsDrug PrescriptionsPhysicians, Primary CarePhysicians, WomenPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsEnglandFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedSex FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsConsultant recommendationsExperimentGender biasGuideline adherencePrescribing behaviourPrimary care physiciansSex differencesSocial influenceVignette study

Identifiers

PMID41735981
PMCPMC13037020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.