ArticleBMC medicine2026
Life-course influence of birthweight and subsequent pathways on healthy aging: a Mendelian randomization study.
Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBirthweight readily measurable marker of fetal growth that may influence health across the lifespan. We aimed to investigate the potential causal association between birthweight and healthy aging and to identify the mediating roles of subsequent socioeconomic, behavioral, functional, and disease-related factors to inform life-course strategies to promote healthy aging and reduce health inequities.
methodsWe performed two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses in European-ancestry participants to estimate the effect of birthweight (n = 298,142-423,683) on two robust, composite healthy aging phenotypes (genetically independent phenotype of aging (aging-GIP) and multivariate aging-related genetic factor (mvAge)) and six individual aging phenotypes, including healthspan, resilience, parental lifespan, self-rated health, phenotypic age deceleration, and 90
resultsGenetically determined each 1-SD higher birthweight was associated with higher aging-GIP (β [95% CI] in different models ranging from 0.131 [0.066-0.196] to 0.162 [0.089-0.235] SDs) and mvAge (0.036 [0.010-0.063] to 0.045 [0.024-0.067]), independent of later-life obesity indicators; also with more interpretable benefits, including 12%-16% higher odds of longer healthspan, a 0.079-0.089 SD improvement in resilience, and a 1.22-1.74 year increase in parental lifespan. Of 100 candidates, 26 and 25 mediated the effect of birthweight on aging-GIP and mvAge, respectively, including socioeconomic indicators (education, household income, occupational attainment; individual mediation proportion: 12.72%-27.79%); behaviors (e.g., cheese intake, age at first sex; 10.38%-29.56%); physical functions (e.g., blood pressure, grip strength; 7.57%-42.65%); and cardiometabolic diseases (e.g., type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases; 25.02%-70.11%).
conclusionsHigher birthweight within the normal range directly promotes healthy aging, mediated by multifaceted modifiable factors. Our findings advocate adopting a life-course approach to foster healthy aging, starting with optimal birthweight and extending to interventions that enhance socioeconomic status, promote healthy behaviors, strengthen physical functions, and prevent cardiometabolic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.