ArticleBMC medical education2026
Point of care ultrasound competency in recent medical school graduates: what to expect from trainees when designing an ultrasound curriculum.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIntegration of Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) training into residency curricula has been pursued in a variety of specialties. There are no standard milestones for medical student POCUS education or competency. We designed a cross-sectional, single-center study of incoming recent medical school graduates at our Internal Medicine residency program to assess POCUS exposure, knowledge and aptitude.
methodsIn 2023, we assessed the POCUS training, knowledge and skill of incoming PGY-1 internal medicine residents at a single center via a novel survey, written knowledge assessment, and an Observed Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) developed for this study. The OSCE measured POCUS image acquisition skill for the following exams: focused cardiac, inferior vena cava, internal jugular, pulmonary, and renal. The results were analyzed via univariate analysis to identify potential associations between medical school POCUS experiences and subsequent POCUS knowledge and skill.
resultsOur study included 61 of 61 incoming PGY-1 internal medicine trainees representing 45 different medical schools. While 80% of participants received ultrasound training in medical school, OSCE performance was variable. Those who received medical school POCUS training obtained an average of 2.71 out of a possible 5.00 acceptable images on the OSCE, while those who were untrained were able to obtain 1.77 out of a possible 5.00 (difference = 0.94, p=0.029). A variety of specific medical school experiences were associated with improved OSCE performance, including preclinical didactic sessions, POCUS use on clinical rotations, and POCUS use on sub-Internship rotations. POCUS use during sub-internship rotations was the only aspect of training associated with improved knowledge assessment performance.
conclusionsWhile 80% of participants reported some form of POCUS training in medical school, the setting, manner, and content of ultrasound training was variable, as was performance on assessments of POCUS knowledge and skill. Image acquisition skill was generally higher among those who received hands on training in medical school, but even within this group performance was highly variable. While this single-center, cross sectional study should be interpreted with caution, it is apparent that residency programs designing POCUS curricula should account for variation in baseline POCUS competency in recent medical school graduates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.