Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41735961›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Characterization of the learning environment for teaching pharmaceutical care: a scoping review.

Mayara de Almeida Lima Ribeiro, Dennis Wesley Andrade Hohenfeld, Thaís Maria Araújo Tavares, Fernando de Castro Araújo-Neto, Alessandra Rezende Mesquita, Giselle de Carvalho Brito, Divaldo Pereira de Lyra

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mayara de Almeida Lima RibeiroLaboratory of Teaching and Research in Social Pharmacy (LEPFS), Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil. mayaraalmeidalimaribeiro@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2185-6970
Dennis Wesley Andrade HohenfeldLaboratory of Teaching and Research in Social Pharmacy (LEPFS), Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-8276-2470
Thaís Maria Araújo TavaresLaboratory of Teaching and Research in Social Pharmacy (LEPFS), Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2074-7879
Fernando de Castro Araújo-NetoMultidisciplinary Center - Macaé. Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences. Macaé, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5180-1463
Alessandra Rezende MesquitaLaboratory of Teaching and Research in Social Pharmacy (LEPFS), Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2988-5829
Giselle de Carvalho BritoLaboratory of Studies in Pharmaceutical Care, Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, Lagarto, Sergipe, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3982-2138
Divaldo Pereira de LyraLaboratory of Teaching and Research in Social Pharmacy (LEPFS), Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0266-0702

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLearning environments encompass aspects related to personal, social, organizational, physical, and virtual components and can affect not only academic performance but also the physical and emotional well-being of students, which in turn impacts the quality of services offered to society. Therefore, this study aimed to characterize the learning environment for pharmaceutical care teaching in the literature.

findingsA scoping review was conducted the databases: Pubmed (Medline), Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and ERIC. The search was conducted in July 2025, without restrictions of year or language. The methodological quality of studies was verified using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). 11 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in this scoping review. They were published between 2010 and 2025, in the United States (n = 4), Malaysia (n = 2; 18.18%), Netherlands, Australia, United Kingdom, Kuwait, and Canada (n = 1; 9.09%). The target population was Pharmacy students. Physical and virtual environments were described, highlighting innovative approaches centered on the student, as follows: experience-based learning (EBL), problem-based learning (PBL), simulation, team-based learning, blended learning and online learning (e-learning). Personal, social, and organizational components were also identified. Innovative strategies have proven effective in the learning process of pharmaceutical care. However, it is important that these findings be reproducible in settings both inside and outside the university. Future research should deepen the understanding of learning environments for teaching Pharmaceutical Care to strengthen scientific production and guide the training of future pharmacists better prepared for patient-centered practices.

Indexed as

Education, PharmacyPharmaceutical ServicesProblem-Based LearningStudents, PharmacyAcademiaHumansLearning environmentsPharmaceutical CarePharmaceutical EducationTeaching

Identifiers

PMID41735961
PMCPMC13037021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.