ArticleBMC ophthalmology2026
Panoptix versus AT Lisa: comparing stability of two trifocal intraocular lenses with different haptic designs using the iTrace system.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of this study was to compare the rotational stability of C-haptic PanOptix Toric (Alcon) and plate haptic AT Lisa Toric (Carl Zeiss Meditec) intraocular lenses (IOLs) using the iTrace system.
methodsThis retrospective study involved 40 patients who underwent trifocal toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, either with the PanOptix Toric IOL (Group 1) or the AT Lisa Toric IOL (Group 2). Rotational stability was assessed at the 3-month postoperative visit using the iTrace Surgical Workstation (Tracey Technologies Corp., Houston, TX, USA) after pupil dilation.
resultsGroup 1 comprised 20 patients, and Group 2 comprised 20 patients. The groups exhibited comparable preoperative characteristics, including age, sex, preoperative uncorrected and best-corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and BDVA), spherical and cylindrical powers, axial length (AL), and corneal astigmatism (all p > 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical, or cylindrical refractive errors at the three-month postoperative assessment (p > 0.05 for each parameter). The rotation angle, as measured by iTrace following pupil dilation, was 9.30 ± 10.84 degrees in Group 1 and 11.45 ± 8.76 degrees in Group 2 (p = 0.495).
conclusionsThe data demonstrate that trifocal toric IOLs with C-haptic and plate-haptic designs have similar rotational stability in individuals with comparable biometric data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.