ArticleBMC oral health2026
Impact of moisture condition, shade-taking device, zirconia color, and thickness on color difference values: an in vitro study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the effect of zirconia color, thickness, and moisture condition on color difference values (ΔE00) using two shade guides. MATERIALS AND
methodsForty-two zirconia specimens were divided into three color groups: A1, A2, and A3 (n = 14 each). Each color group comprised two thickness groups (1.5 and 2.0 mm; n = 7 each) and underwent testing over 50 V anodization titanium background specimen (n = 7) in wet and dry conditions, yielding 12 experimental groups. All the specimens were examined using a spectrophotometer and compared with the two control groups (zirconia and vita shade guides, n = 1) to establish ΔE00. The ΔE001 (zirconia shade guide) and ΔE002 (vita shade guide) values were calculated for the first and second hypotheses, respectively. ΔE00 values = 1.8 were considered 50% clinically acceptable threshold (AT). The data collected were statistically analyzed using analysis of variance and appropriate post-hoc tests (P = .05).
resultsThe wet/dry condition, zirconia color, and thickness significantly affected the observed ΔE00 (P <.05) for both shade guides. The dry condition using 1.5- and 2.0-mm zirconia revealed values same as or greater than the estimated mean when compared with the wet condition (P < .05) for both shade guides. In contrast to the vita shade guide, all the mean and 95% confidence interval (CI) values of ΔE001were below 50% AT, except 1.5-mm zirconia with A1 and A3 shades in dry condition.
conclusionsThe use of a 1.5-mm and A1–A3 shade zirconia over yellow-anodized titanium potentially results in acceptable color matching with 95% CIs using a combination of wet condition and zirconia shade guide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.