ArticleBMC public health2026
COVID-19 transmission dynamics: age-specific patterns and super spreaders in South Korea.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe global spread of COVID-19 has underscored the vital need for precise tracing of individuals involved in transmitting the virus through contact tracing. It is crucial to identify both those who spread the virus (infectors) and those who contract it (infectees) in order to gain a detailed understanding of the transmission dynamics.
methodsWe investigate age-specific infection patterns and their impacts by analyzing a unique dataset of the COVID-19 infection network in South Korea. In particular, we derive degree-based distributions from infection tree networks reconstructed through contact tracing of secondary infections, thereby identifying instances of Super Spreading Events (SSEs). Furthermore, we thoroughly examined age-specific infection networks using various metrics such as edge counting, entropy, density, and centrality.
resultsOur findings reveal systematic variations in age-specific COVID-19 patterns in South Korea. In particular, individuals aged 50 to 64 exhibit the highest centrality and number of connections within the COVID-19 infection network, underscoring their pivotal role in transmission dynamics. Moreover, the 20-49 age group consistently exhibited the lowest proportion of asymptomatic cases, in contrast to the higher rates observed among the 0-19 and 65≤ age groups. These results suggest that age groups differ not only in their structural positions within the transmission network but also in their clinical presentation, both of which are crucial for understanding the spread of infection.
conclusionAnalyzing age-specific infection networks is vital for clarifying transmission patterns and susceptibility across different age groups. Our study provides valuable evidence for identifying vulnerable populations and key cohorts that drive dissemination within the infection network. These insights can directly inform policy formulation, particularly in prioritizing vaccination strategies and tailoring age-targeted prevention measures. More broadly, this network-based approach offers a framework for designing effective control strategies against future emerging infectious diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.