Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41735849›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2026

Protein structure and selection pressure in plants: using mutation to understand the functional importance of protein structure.

Evan Long, Grey Monroe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Evan LongUnited States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service, Northwest Irrigation and Soils Research Laboratory, Kimberly, ID, 83341, USA. Evan.Long@usda.gov.
Grey MonroeDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in protein structure prediction have opened new avenues for understanding the potential impact of genetic mutations and how they might affect protein structure. In this study, we analyzed the distribution and structural characteristics of mutations in four plant species: Arabidopsis, rice, sugar beet, and cassava. We integrated population genotype datasets with protein structure predictions to map mutation positions to their corresponding gene protein products and structural features. Our analysis reveals that high-effect mutations are more likely to occur in unstructured, disordered regions of proteins rather than in well-folded, conserved regions. This finding suggests that natural selection exerts greater pressure to conserve sequence integrity in folded regions, which are crucial for protein function. Conversely, disordered regions may tolerate higher variability exhibiting a higher frequency of impactful mutations. By providing a comprehensive overview of mutation distribution in relation to protein structure, this study enhances our understanding of the evolutionary pressures shaping plant proteomes. The insights gained from this research could inform future studies on protein function, evolutionary biology, and plant improvement strategies.

Indexed as

MutationPlant ProteinsPlantsSelection, GeneticArabidopsisBeta vulgarisEvolution, MolecularOryzaProtein ConformationProtein FoldingPlant ProteinsMutationProtein FoldingProtein StructureSelection Pressure

Identifiers

PMID41735849
PMCPMC13037108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.