ReviewKorean journal of radiology2026
Photon-Counting CT in Cardiovascular Imaging: Clinical Applications.
Review in Korean journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metastatic pulmonary calcification mimicking refractory pneumonia in an end stage renal disease patient: A diagnostic pitfall.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- A physics primer on photon-counting detectors in CT: Physics, signal formation, and performance.Medical physics · 2026Review
- Response to "Photon-Counting CT in Cardiovascular Imaging: From Technical Promise to Clinical Translation".Korean journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Photon-Counting CT in Cardiovascular Imaging: From Technical Promise to Clinical Translation.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Photon-counting CT (PCCT) uses semiconductor detectors to directly convert X-ray photons to electrical signals, the intensity of which is directly proportional to the energy of the individual photons. PCCT offers several advantages in cardiovascular imaging, including ultra-high-resolution (UHR) imaging, improved multi-energy capabilities, reduced noise and artifacts, and improved iodine signal and radiation dose efficiencies. UHR imaging enhances the assessment of small vessels, dense calcifications, and stents. Multienergy mode enhances the iodine signal, reduces artifacts, and allows for material separation and lesion characterization. In this article, we review PCCT technology, highlight the benefits of PCCT in cardiovascular imaging using case examples, and discuss its challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.