ArticleSpine deformity2026
Evaluating brace holiday outcomes in idiopathic scoliosis.
Article in Spine deformity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Treatment outcomes across curve patterns and severities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with a pattern-specific CAD-CAM brace.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn idiopathic scoliosis, the psychological and social effects of bracing can be difficult, thus clinicians sometimes recommend a brace holiday when the curve drops below 25°. While the Scoliosis Research Society has reached a consensus on bracing indications and duration, there is little evidence regarding outcomes from taking a break from bracing prior to skeletal maturity. We hypothesized there would be no relationship between taking a brace holiday and final primary curve. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective cohort study at a single institution was performed for idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with a brace whose primary curve corrected to below 25° from 2016 to 2022. Objective bracing compliance I-button data was collected on patients aged 3 - 18 years old at the time of brace presentation. Patients with neuromuscular and syndromic etiologies of scoliosis and those ineligible for a brace holiday were excluded. Univariate analyses were performed as appropriate.
results34 patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 16 received a brace holiday (18 did not). At most recent follow up, primary curve size did not differ between those who received a brace holiday (23.1 ± 12.6°) and those who did not (21.7 ± 6.1°) (p = 0.772). Brace holidays lasted on average 17.8 ± 10.7 months, occurring at a mean age 10.6 ± 1.5 years in patients with a mean primary curve of 14.9 ± 3.6° at the beginning of the holiday. The mean age for patients who resumed bracing (n = 12) was 12.0 ± 0.9 years, at a mean primary curve of 29.3 ± 4.1°, with a most recent mean primary curve of 26.4 ± 12.4°.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that select younger patients who take a brace holiday may not have clinically relevant differences in final primary curve magnitude compared to standard-of-care adolescents. This work offers evidence that can be valuable in the productive dialogue with families on the risks and benefits of a brace holiday. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41735752What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.