ArticleJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2026
Patient Perspectives on the Process and Outcome of Group Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy for Chronic Pain.
Article in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychological Pain Care in Medical Settings: A Special Issue Highlighting Recent Advances in Intervention and Delivery.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy (EAET) targets traumatic or conflictual emotional and interpersonal contributors to chronic pain. This qualitative study examined patients' experiences of 4-session, group EAET conducted in an Australian tertiary pain clinic. Interviews with 10 adults who completed the therapy were analyzed via thematic analysis. Seven themes were identified. Patients noted that EAET was emotionally "challenging but worth it," and that the group "provided strength in numbers, usually." Although only some patients reported pain reduction, most reported that EAET was beneficial in various respects, including improving their relationship to pain ("pain takes a back seat") and improved interpersonal and emotional functioning ("changing relationships"). Regarding therapy structure and content, patients experienced "validation in pain education," but felt that the program was too short and needed additional care provision given its high intensity ("healing takes time" and "need for ongoing care"). All patients recommended EAET, although with some caveats, especially about format and patient readiness. This study finds that EAET is viewed as helpful by people with chronic pain, especially regarding their emotional and interpersonal functioning, and with some improvement in pain or how it is experienced. Yet, EAET is also emotionally challenging, and the 4-session version conducted here is too brief; attention needs to be given to extending its length and monitoring and responding to individual differences among patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41735737What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.