Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41735713›Full record

ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2026

Active learning in pharmaceutical 3D printing: a multi-dataset comparison.

Moe Elbadawi, Noorul Fathima Abdul Kafoor, Hanxiang Li, Chrystalla Protopapa, Marilena Vlachou, Simon Gaisford

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Moe ElbadawiSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London,, E1 4DQ, UK. m.elbadawi@qmul.ac.uk.
Noorul Fathima Abdul KafoorSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London,, E1 4DQ, UK.
Hanxiang LiUCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London, WC1N 1AX, UK.
Chrystalla ProtopapaSchool of Pharmacy, Section of Pharmaceutical Technology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 84, Athens, Greece.
Marilena VlachouSchool of Pharmacy, Section of Pharmaceutical Technology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 84, Athens, Greece.
Simon GaisfordUCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London, WC1N 1AX, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) is expected to accelerate the developments of three-dimensional (3D) printed medicines. Despite ML's potential, the need for large datasets can hinder progression, as 3D printing remains an emerging pharmaceutical manufacturing technology. This study explores an ML strategy called active learning (AL), which harnesses the benefits of ML whilst applicable with small datasets. AL was tested to predict the printability of three 3D printing datasets: 1437 fused deposition modelling (FDM), 650 vat polymerisation and 297 selective laser sintering (SLS) formulations. The analysis revealed that accuracies of 60% can be achieved when starting with 33 formulations, and subsequent increases in training data size enhances predictive performance. Furthermore, AL was found to achieve 100% predictive accuracy, which is the highest recorded to date for pharmaceutical 3D printing. These initial findings highlight AL's advantages over traditional ML modelling and showcase its potential to accelerate the development of 3D printing medicines. This research also demonstrates the potential of modelling with small datasets, thereby widening ML's application in pharmaceutical research.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPrinting, Three-DimensionalTechnology, PharmaceuticalPredictive Learning ModelsActive machine learningAdditive manufacturingArtificial intelligenceComputational modellingDrug developmentIn silicoSustainability

Identifiers

PMID41735713
PMCPMC13619682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.