ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2026
Active learning in pharmaceutical 3D printing: a multi-dataset comparison.
Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Machine Learning Platform for Imputing Missing Critical Quality Attributes in Pharmaceutical Development.The AAPS journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) is expected to accelerate the developments of three-dimensional (3D) printed medicines. Despite ML's potential, the need for large datasets can hinder progression, as 3D printing remains an emerging pharmaceutical manufacturing technology. This study explores an ML strategy called active learning (AL), which harnesses the benefits of ML whilst applicable with small datasets. AL was tested to predict the printability of three 3D printing datasets: 1437 fused deposition modelling (FDM), 650 vat polymerisation and 297 selective laser sintering (SLS) formulations. The analysis revealed that accuracies of 60% can be achieved when starting with 33 formulations, and subsequent increases in training data size enhances predictive performance. Furthermore, AL was found to achieve 100% predictive accuracy, which is the highest recorded to date for pharmaceutical 3D printing. These initial findings highlight AL's advantages over traditional ML modelling and showcase its potential to accelerate the development of 3D printing medicines. This research also demonstrates the potential of modelling with small datasets, thereby widening ML's application in pharmaceutical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.