ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Impact of forage-free diet with cottonseed cake and of feeding frequency using an automated system on productivity and profitability in feedlot-finished cattle.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sensor-Based Precision Feeding Systems in Animal Production: Technologies and Applications.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We hypothesized that a forage-free diet, with cottonseed cake as the fiber source and administered six times daily using an automated system by a feeder robot, could optimize the productive and economic performance of feedlot-finished cattle. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of fiber source and feeding frequency on the productive and economic performance of beef cattle finished in a feedlot. Twenty-four uncastrated, 24-month-old Nellore young bulls, averaging 462 ± 23.44 kg in initial live weight were used in a completely randomized design with a 2 × 2 factorial scheme incorporating two fiber sources (corn silage or cottonseed cake) and two feeding frequencies (twice or six times per day) with six replicates of each. Replacing silage with cottonseed cake did not affect productive performance (P > 0.05). However, it resulted in lower feed costs (P = 0.003) and a higher net margin per animal (P = 0.02). Twice-daily automated feeding increased nutrient intake (P < 0.05) and showed a trend toward higher average daily gain (P = 0.06). Rumination time was longer with a forage-based diet (P < 0.05), whereas rumination efficiency was higher with a forage-free diet (P = 0.02). Cottonseed cake is a viable alternative to forage-free diets in feedlots. However, increasing feeding frequency did not provide additional benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.