Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41735699›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2026

Trends in TikTok: Educational and Advocacy Content on Colon Cancer in Young Adults Highlights Healthcare Challenges.

Maanvi Vij, Robert Gordon, Lucas Heilbroner, Katherine Rangoussis, Omar Abu-Ghannam, Jeni Zhang, Anushka Deogaonkar, Marie L Borum

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maanvi VijDepartment of Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 900 23rd St NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC, USA.
Robert GordonDepartment of Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 900 23rd St NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC, USA.
Lucas HeilbronerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 900 23rd St NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC, USA.
Katherine RangoussisDepartment of Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 900 23rd St NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC, USA.
Omar Abu-GhannamDepartment of Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 900 23rd St NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC, USA.
Jeni ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 900 23rd St NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC, USA.
Anushka DeogaonkarDepartment of Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 900 23rd St NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC, USA. anushkadeogaonkar1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-3118-0446
Marie L BorumDepartment of Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 900 23rd St NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

TikTok has emerged as one of the most effective ways of sharing information among the younger generation. Colorectal cancer (CRC), in particular, has become a subject of interest amongst TikTok users with CRC being diagnosed at younger ages. There have been debates about TikTok’s legitimacy with concerns about the dissemination of misinformation. This study analyzed TikTok videos on CRC in young adults for content and reliability of information. This study utilized a cross-sectional content analysis of the 100 most-liked TikTok videos under the search term “colon cancer in younger people” to assess the nature and accuracy of colorectal cancer (CRC) information. Videos were categorized by content, emotional tone, and information type, with accuracy evaluated against verified medical sources. Misinformation was classified into three categories, and quality was assessed using the Global Quality Score. Statistical and thematic analyses were conducted to identify key discourse patterns. This study analyzed 100 TikTok videos on colorectal cancer (CRC) over the past five years, with viewership ranging from a few thousand to 10.8 million. Most creators were female (59%), and 57% were CRC patients. The average age of CRC patients discussed was 26 (range: 14–37). Content focused on CRC symptoms (63%), screening (51%), treatment (25%), and causes (21%). Advocacy was the dominant theme (68%), while fear (46%) and medical mistrust (21%) were also common. Chi-square analysis revealed patients were more likely to share personal narratives than Health Care Providers (HCPs) (X² = 58.8, p < 0.00001). Misinformation was found in 9 videos, with 19% from HCPs, 2% from patients, and 75% from social media influencers. A Z-test showed HCP videos were more likely to contain misinformation than patient videos (Z = 2.85, p = 0.00438). GQS analysis showed no significant differences in quality across creator groups (F(3, 96) = 0.43, p = 0.73). This study highlights the growing role of TikTok as a health communication tool, particularly among young adults at risk for early-onset colorectal cancer. The findings reveal that videos on TikTok often include both educational content and personal narratives about CRC, with a notable emphasis on prevention and the emotional impacts of fear and mistrust. Healthcare providers should engage in empathetic, accessible communication to address these emotional themes and combat misinformation. Institutions and healthcare professionals should consider leveraging social media to share accurate, evidence-based health information and consider integrating digital communication training into professional development.

Identifiers

PMID41735699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.