Article3D printing in medicine2026
Development and validation of an affordable freehand scanning 3D ultrasound reconstruction system with visual positioning.
Article in 3D printing in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThree-dimensional (3D) ultrasound provides more intuitive, detailed, and comprehensive diagnostic information. The primary objective of this study was to develop affordable, lightweight, and wide-field 3D ultrasound probes which is a critical challenge for expanding the accessibility and utility of this technology.
methodsWe describe an affordable freehand scanning 3D ultrasound reconstruction system. The system utilizes a QR code film attached to the skin surface for positioning. During each ultrasound scan, a lightweight camera fixed on the probe records the QR codes within the scanning area. Based on QR code features, a skin map is constructed, and ultrasound images and film image information are preprocessed. The calibration relationship between the ultrasound probe and camera field of view is determined. Finally, comprehensive algorithms such as ORB-SLAM positioning are used for three-dimensional image reconstruction.
resultsThrough hand-scanning tests, the results show that the scanning speed is 15 mm/s, and when the image acquisition frame rates are 10 Fps/s, 20 Fps/s, and 30 Fps/s, the maximum cumulative error of ORB-SLAM algorithm positioning does not exceed 2%, meeting the positioning requirements of the intelligent skin texture image reconstruction system for thyroid ultrasound. Additionally, the effectiveness of three-dimensional reconstruction is verified through model volume testing.
conclusionThe intelligent skin texture image reconstruction system for ultrasound can achieve 3D image reconstruction, displaying lesion features and the spatial positions of surrounding tissues in three-dimensional space, thereby assisting ultrasound doctors in making accurate and rapid diagnoses. Clinical trial number: not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.