ReviewJournal of molecular modeling2026
Multi-scale molecular dynamics of perovskite quantum dots: from atomic fluctuations to predictive stability design.
Review in Journal of molecular modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Driven Advances in Perovskite Materials and Solar Cells.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextPerovskite quantum dots (PQDs) are promising nanomaterials for optoelectronic and energy-conversion applications due to their high photoluminescence quantum yield, tunable bandgap, and defect tolerance. However, their soft ionic lattices exhibit dynamic disorder, anharmonic vibrations, and ion migration, leading to challenges in structural and optoelectronic stability. This review elucidates how molecular dynamics (MD) simulations decode the interplay of atomic fluctuations, lattice dynamics, and surface reconstruction in PQDs, revealing mechanisms governing their stability and performance. It highlights how multi-scale MD frameworks link femtosecond-scale atomic motions to microsecond-scale degradation processes, enabling predictive design of resilient PQDs. Key findings include the role of anharmonic lattice vibrations in defect tolerance, the impact of surface ligand dynamics on emission linewidth, and the mitigation of ion migration through matrix embedding, offering strategies for enhanced device reliability.
methodsClassical molecular dynamics (CMD) simulations employ Lennard-Jones, Buckingham, ReaxFF, and COMB3 force fields to model mesoscale phenomena, including ligand rearrangement and surface fusion. Ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) uses density functional theory (DFT) with PBE and HSE06 functionals, typically with plane-wave basis sets (e.g., PAW), to capture ion-electron coupling and lattice anharmonicity. Nonadiabatic molecular dynamics (NAMD) incorporates surface hopping to simulate ultrafast charge transfer. Machine-learning potentials, trained via neural networks and Gaussian processes, enhance sampling with metadynamics and replica-exchange techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41735608What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.