ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026
Primary Care Telehealth and Patient Utilization, Quality, and Spending in Traditional Medicare.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Health Readiness and Medicare Primary Care Spending: Nationwide County-Level Observational Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Observational
- Digital infrastructure and proxies of ambulatory care access in Russia, 2018-2024: a regional panel study with a national telemedicine signal analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoverage for telehealth services was expanded during the COVID-19 public health emergency for traditional Medicare (TM) beneficiaries. It is unclear how increased provision of telehealth services is associated with primary care service volume, healthcare spending, or patient outcomes.
objectiveTo examine the impact of a practice's level of primary care telehealth delivery on healthcare utilization, spending, and patient outcomes.
designUsing a difference-in-differences design, this retrospective cohort study compared changes in outcomes from the pre-pandemic period (1/1/2019-12/31/2019) to the post-telehealth expansion period (7/1/2020-12/31/2022) between TM beneficiaries attributed to primary care practices delivering the highest versus lowest quartile of telehealth evaluation and management (E&M) visits during the early-pandemic period (January-June 2020).
participantsA nationally representative 20% random sample of TM beneficiaries between 2019 and 2022. MAIN MEASURES: Outcomes included total and in-person E&M visits; total hospitalizations and ambulatory care-sensitive admissions (ASCAs); total and preventable emergency department (ED) visits; and inpatient, outpatient, and total healthcare spending. KEY
resultsThe study included 1,238,734 patients (60% attributed to high-telehealth practices). In adjusted analyses, high-telehealth practice attribution was associated with a decrease in in-person E&M visits (-0.86 visits per patient per year; 95% CI, -0.94 to -0.78), an increase in total E&M visits (0.10 visits per patient per year; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.18), and a modest increase in total ED visits (0.02 visits per patient per year; 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.03) and preventable ED visits (0.01 visits per patient per year; 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.02). There were no significant changes in total hospitalizations, ambulatory care-sensitive admissions, or healthcare spending.
conclusionsGreater telehealth delivery by primary care practices was associated with a decline in in-person E&M visits and a small net increase in total E&M visits. These changes were not associated with differences in hospitalizations or overall healthcare spending. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.