Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41735606›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026

Primary Care Telehealth and Patient Utilization, Quality, and Spending in Traditional Medicare.

Derek T Lake, Jiani Yu, Lawrence P Casalino, Arian Jung, Manyao Zhang, Reekarl Pierre, Dhruv Khullar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Derek T LakeDivision of Health Policy and Economics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. Del2018@med.cornell.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6250-8737
Jiani YuDivision of Health Policy and Economics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Lawrence P CasalinoDivision of Health Policy and Economics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Arian JungDivision of Health Policy and Economics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Manyao ZhangDivision of Health Policy and Economics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Reekarl PierreDivision of Health Policy and Economics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Dhruv KhullarDivision of Health Policy and Economics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoverage for telehealth services was expanded during the COVID-19 public health emergency for traditional Medicare (TM) beneficiaries. It is unclear how increased provision of telehealth services is associated with primary care service volume, healthcare spending, or patient outcomes.

objectiveTo examine the impact of a practice's level of primary care telehealth delivery on healthcare utilization, spending, and patient outcomes.

designUsing a difference-in-differences design, this retrospective cohort study compared changes in outcomes from the pre-pandemic period (1/1/2019-12/31/2019) to the post-telehealth expansion period (7/1/2020-12/31/2022) between TM beneficiaries attributed to primary care practices delivering the highest versus lowest quartile of telehealth evaluation and management (E&M) visits during the early-pandemic period (January-June 2020).

participantsA nationally representative 20% random sample of TM beneficiaries between 2019 and 2022. MAIN MEASURES: Outcomes included total and in-person E&M visits; total hospitalizations and ambulatory care-sensitive admissions (ASCAs); total and preventable emergency department (ED) visits; and inpatient, outpatient, and total healthcare spending. KEY

resultsThe study included 1,238,734 patients (60% attributed to high-telehealth practices). In adjusted analyses, high-telehealth practice attribution was associated with a decrease in in-person E&M visits (-0.86 visits per patient per year; 95% CI, -0.94 to -0.78), an increase in total E&M visits (0.10 visits per patient per year; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.18), and a modest increase in total ED visits (0.02 visits per patient per year; 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.03) and preventable ED visits (0.01 visits per patient per year; 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.02). There were no significant changes in total hospitalizations, ambulatory care-sensitive admissions, or healthcare spending.

conclusionsGreater telehealth delivery by primary care practices was associated with a decline in in-person E&M visits and a small net increase in total E&M visits. These changes were not associated with differences in hospitalizations or overall healthcare spending. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health ExpendituresMedicarePatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CareTelemedicineAgedAged, 80 and overDigital HealthEmergency Room VisitsFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesUnited Stateshealthcare costshealthcare utilizationmedicareprimary caretelehealth

Identifiers

PMID41735606
PMCPMC13493762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.