ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Interbody cage subsidence after ACDF: a predictor of non-union and neck pain despite normal bone mineral density.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A case of transvertebral anterior cervical foraminotomy for radiculopathy caused by cage subsidence.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the association between preoperative bone mineral density (BMD) and cage subsidence following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and to assess the impact of subsidence on fusion rates and clinical long term-outcomes.We retrospectively reviewed records of patients who underwent ACDF for degenerative cervical disc disease over an 11-year period. Preoperative cervical spine CT scans were analyzed to quantify BMD, while postoperative radiographs were used to identify cage subsidence. Binary logistic regression was used to identify association of radiographic and clinical outcome parameters. A total of 102 patients were included. Cage subsidence occurred in 19.6% of patients. Median BMD was 222.6 mg/cm3 among patients with cage subsidence and 232.6 mg/cm3 in the non-subsidence group (p = 0.505). Fusion was observed significantly more often in the non-subsidence group (p = 0.004). Binary logistic regression showed that cage subsidence was negatively associated with segment fusion in patients treated with stand-alone cages (OR 9.444; p = 0.0002) and was associated with overall higher revision surgery rates (OR 4.879; p = 0.012). Furhtermore, non-union of the segment was significantly associated with worsening neck pain (OR 3.182; p = 0.024), but had no effect on mJOA scores (p = 0.360) or arm pain (p = 0.243). Contrary to previous findings in the lumbar spine, bone mineral density was not associated with cage subsidence in ACDF. In stand-alone cage constructs, subsidence was linked to non-union, contributing to persistent neck pain and increased revision surgery rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41735598What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.