ArticleBehavior research methods2026
Collection of body-object interaction ratings for 5,637 Japanese words.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Body-object interaction (BOI)-the degree to which a person physically interacts with objects or entities-has been shown to affect language processing, although studies have reported inconsistent results depending on the language or context. Moreover, no large-scale BOI database exists for Japanese. To address this gap, we collected BOI ratings for 5,637 Japanese words from 1,267 native Japanese speakers. The ratings demonstrated notable levels of intra-item and inter-rater reliability and cross-linguistic validity. We further examined the relationship between BOI ratings and normative data from a lexical decision task for Japanese words. A hierarchical multiple regression analysis controlling for various lexical and semantic variables revealed that BOI was a significant predictor of lexical decision task performance. However, unlike the original BOI effect, higher BOI ratings were associated with longer response times and lower accuracy. This finding aligns with recent results from large-scale studies on BOI data collection, highlighting the need to reevaluate the impact of BOI on lexical processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41735596What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.