Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41735596›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

Collection of body-object interaction ratings for 5,637 Japanese words.

Masaya Mochizuki, Naoto Ota

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Masaya MochizukiCollege of Humanities and Sciences, Nihon University, Sakurajosui, Setagaya-ku, 3-25-40, Tokyo, 156-8550, Japan. mochizuki.masaya@nihon-u.ac.jp.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7577-7621
Naoto OtaDepartment of Psychology, Aichi Shukutoku University, Aichi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5105-0859

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP24K15684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Body-object interaction (BOI)-the degree to which a person physically interacts with objects or entities-has been shown to affect language processing, although studies have reported inconsistent results depending on the language or context. Moreover, no large-scale BOI database exists for Japanese. To address this gap, we collected BOI ratings for 5,637 Japanese words from 1,267 native Japanese speakers. The ratings demonstrated notable levels of intra-item and inter-rater reliability and cross-linguistic validity. We further examined the relationship between BOI ratings and normative data from a lexical decision task for Japanese words. A hierarchical multiple regression analysis controlling for various lexical and semantic variables revealed that BOI was a significant predictor of lexical decision task performance. However, unlike the original BOI effect, higher BOI ratings were associated with longer response times and lower accuracy. This finding aligns with recent results from large-scale studies on BOI data collection, highlighting the need to reevaluate the impact of BOI on lexical processing.

Indexed as

LanguageAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedReaction TimeReproducibility of ResultsSemanticsYoung AdultBody–object interactionGrounded cognitionJapaneseNormsSensorimotor information

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.