Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41735579›Full record

ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2026

Use of Incurred Sample Reproducibility Data to Support Long Term Stability of Therapeutic Antibodies in Clinical Bioanalytical Methods.

Catherine L Brockus, Likitha Venkatesh

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Catherine L BrockusADME External Bioanalysis and Oversight, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46285, USA. brockus_catherine_l@lilly.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4314-6762
Likitha VenkateshADME Drug Disposition - Scientific Oversight, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-6930-4220

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ICH Guideline M10, adopted by the EMA in July 2022 and implemented in January 2023, recommends that stability testing of quality controls (QCs) should match actual sample analyte concentrations, prompting adjustments in QC levels when samples exceed analytical ranges. Laboratories continue long-term stability (LTS) testing on ultra-high concentration quality controls (UHQCs) which are often defined by multiples of the upper limit of quantification (ULOQ) rather than observed maximum concentrations (Cmax). Based on recommendations for implementation of the M10 Guideline regarding Phase 3 clinical trials, we questioned the need for further LTS testing at UHQC levels beyond Phase 2. To address LTS timeline challenges, incurred sample reproducibility (ISR) data from clinical studies were compiled, evaluating their relevance to Cmax and utilizing a Random Intercept Model (RIM) as a tool for establishing stability profiles for drug analytes. Analysis showed most UHQCs estimated using simple ULOQ multiples may not accurately reflect Cmax. Clinical ISR data provided evidence of stability across analyte concentrations within patient matrices with a high degree of confidence. Predictive tools based on ISR data were proposed as a practical approach to demonstrate stability. ISR data can support claims of analyte stability including at ultra-high concentrations, consistent with the M10 guideline and established LTS from validation testing. Using ISR from clinical reports reduces reliance on lengthy LTS testing, offering a robust, efficient method for establishing stability profiles from real-world samples to accomplish regulatory expectations while optimizing workflows.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalDrug StabilityHumansLimit of DetectionQuality ControlReproducibility of ResultsAntibodies, MonoclonalICH M10 guidelineincurred sample reanalysislong-term stabilitypredictive model

Identifiers

PMID41735579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.