ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2026
Use of Incurred Sample Reproducibility Data to Support Long Term Stability of Therapeutic Antibodies in Clinical Bioanalytical Methods.
Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ICH Guideline M10, adopted by the EMA in July 2022 and implemented in January 2023, recommends that stability testing of quality controls (QCs) should match actual sample analyte concentrations, prompting adjustments in QC levels when samples exceed analytical ranges. Laboratories continue long-term stability (LTS) testing on ultra-high concentration quality controls (UHQCs) which are often defined by multiples of the upper limit of quantification (ULOQ) rather than observed maximum concentrations (Cmax). Based on recommendations for implementation of the M10 Guideline regarding Phase 3 clinical trials, we questioned the need for further LTS testing at UHQC levels beyond Phase 2. To address LTS timeline challenges, incurred sample reproducibility (ISR) data from clinical studies were compiled, evaluating their relevance to Cmax and utilizing a Random Intercept Model (RIM) as a tool for establishing stability profiles for drug analytes. Analysis showed most UHQCs estimated using simple ULOQ multiples may not accurately reflect Cmax. Clinical ISR data provided evidence of stability across analyte concentrations within patient matrices with a high degree of confidence. Predictive tools based on ISR data were proposed as a practical approach to demonstrate stability. ISR data can support claims of analyte stability including at ultra-high concentrations, consistent with the M10 guideline and established LTS from validation testing. Using ISR from clinical reports reduces reliance on lengthy LTS testing, offering a robust, efficient method for establishing stability profiles from real-world samples to accomplish regulatory expectations while optimizing workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41735579What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.