Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41735553›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Self-reported voice symptoms in e-cigarette users: a cross-sectional study.

Fatma Alanazy, Reema M Alshehri, Maha B Alzahrani, Rand J Al Jarallah, Abdulmohsin S Aldossari, Ahmed Alroqi, Tamer A Mesallam

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fatma AlanazyDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, King Abdulaziz Rd, Al Malaz, Riyadh, 12629, Saudi Arabia. Falanazy@ksu.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4420-3243
Reema M AlshehriMedical Students, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Maha B AlzahraniMedical Students, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Rand J Al JarallahMedical Students, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulmohsin S AldossariResident, King Saud University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed AlroqiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, King Abdulaziz Rd, Al Malaz, Riyadh, 12629, Saudi Arabia.
Tamer A MesallamDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, King Abdulaziz Rd, Al Malaz, Riyadh, 12629, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use has risen sharply, particularly among young adults who tend to view vaping as safer than conventional smoking. The larynx and vocal folds sit directly in the path of inhaled aerosols, yet the impact of e-cigarette use on voice remains poorly described, particularly in Saudi Arabia.

objectiveTo assess self-reported voice handicap among current, former, and never e-cigarette users in Saudi Arabia using the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10), and to examine factors linked to abnormal voice scores.

methodsAn online cross-sectional survey of 1,445 adults was carried out across Saudi Arabia from July to August 2025. Participants were categorized by smoking status as current e-cigarette users, former users, conventional smokers, or never smokers. The survey collected data on demographics, smoking behavior, and voice handicap using the VHI-10. Statistical analysis included t-tests, chi-square tests, Pearson correlations, and multivariable logistic regression.

resultsFormer e-cigarette users recorded higher VHI-10 scores (3.9 ± 6.9) than current users (2.2 ± 4.7, p = 0.002). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that former users had higher odds of abnormal voice scores than current users (OR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.04–3.36, p = 0.038). Current users reported longer duration of use, higher daily consumption, and higher nicotine concentration. Perceptions of e-cigarette risks differed across groups, with current users more likely to rate vaping as less harmful.

conclusionE-cigarette use relates to measurable self-reported voice handicap, and former users report more vocal difficulties than current users. This pattern may reflect consistent with more noticeable symptoms among former users or limited awareness of vocal problems among individuals who continue to vape. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: level 4. This study is Level 4 evidence because it is observational, crosssectional, and lacks randomization, followup, or the ability to determine causality. It relies on selfreported subjective data (VHI10) with limited control of confounders, and it is not a cohort study, RCT, or systematic review.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSelf ReportVapingVoice DisordersAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSaudi ArabiaYoung AdultE-cigarettesHoarsenessLaryngeal healthLarynxSaudi arabiaVapingVocal fatigueVocal healthVoice handicap index (VHI-10)

Identifiers

PMID41735553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.