ArticleLeukemia2026
Characteristics and outcome determinants in children, adolescents and young adults who failed tisagenlecleucel for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Article in Leukemia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), an autologous anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, has significantly improved outcomes in pediatric, adolescents and young adults with relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R BCP-ALL). However, 30-50% experience early failure or relapse. We retrospectively analyzed 52 cases of early failures (n = 13) or relapses (n = 39), evaluating post-tisa-cel outcomes and prognostic factors. CD19 antigen loss was the only factor associated with a lower complete remission rate after salvage therapy (OR = 0.16, 95%CI [0.03-0.90], p = 0.04). Median overall survival (OS) was 14.5 months, with a 2-year OS of 37.4% (95%CI [24.4-50.4]), similar between early failure (38.5%) and relapse (37.0%) groups (p = 0.78). Patients with measurable residual disease only at salvage initiation had significantly improved 2-year OS (61.9%, (95%CI [38.1-78.8])) compared to those with overt disease (20.7%, (95%CI [8.4-36.7], p = 0.008)). Factors associated with inferior OS included high pre-infusion tumor burden (HR = 3.57, p < 0.01), and prior inotuzumab ozogamicin exposure (HR = 3.81, p < 0.01). Although salvage therapies and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation benefit some patients, 5 of 18 transplanted patients died from treatment-related toxicity, underscoring the significant associated risks. These findings highlight the poor prognosis of tisa-cel failures and the urgent need for novel strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41735483What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.