ArticleScientific reports2026
Low fungal knowledge and limited identification skills: study reveals a species literacy gap among laypeople from Germany.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dual-Platform Mushroom Cultivation for STEM Education: AI-Assisted Environmental Monitoring and Student Perceptions.Education sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biodiversity is one of nature’s greatest assets and is essential for planetary health and human well-being. However, global biodiversity continues to decline at an alarming rate, partly due to limited public engagement in conservation efforts. Previous research has revealed low levels of species knowledge among the public, particularly regarding native plants and animals. However, studies on species literacy with a focus on fungi, one of the most species-rich kingdoms, remain scarce. This study assessed fungal species literacy among a representative sample of laypeople from Germany (n = 747) through an identification and knowledge test and examined potential predictors. Identification skills were associated with collecting behavior, rural residence, nature connectedness, and age. On average, participants identified only 16.7% of native fungal species, and more than a quarter (26%) could not identify any. Edibility was correctly assessed in 36.0% of the cases, and the majority believed that fungi are plants. These findings reveal a substantial gap in fungal species literacy, likely perpetuating the continued neglect of fungi in research, conservation and education, which in turn can have negative effects on global conservation goals. To address this gap, the results could provide insights for strengthening fungal representation in school curricula and public education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.