ArticleScientific reports2026
Contextual anatomy-guided deep learning for accurate fovea segmentation in diabetic retinopathy fundus images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate fovea segmentation in fundus images is a critical step in diabetic retinopathy screening; however, it remains a challenging task due to the indistinct boundaries of the fovea. Beyond simple localization, precise segmentation offers essential clinical value for Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) management, as treatment decisions-specifically the choice between intravitreal anti-VEGF injection for center-involved DME and laser therapy for extrafoveal edema-depend on the accurate delineation of the foveal region. While existing methods often rely on increasing model architecture complexity, the potential of anatomical context within the training process remains under-explored. This paper presents a data-centric approach that leverages contextual information to robustly identify the fovea. We demonstrate that progressively incorporating key anatomical landmarks-the optic disc, retina, and blood vessels-into training labels significantly enhances fovea detection. To facilitate this, we developed IDRiD-RETA-FV, a meticulously annotated dataset comprising 81 images (54 training, 27 testing) with complete anatomical structures (inter-observer F1=0.98), and introduce MNv4Fovea, a framework designed to explicitly exploit these anatomical inter-dependencies through a multi-class constraints mechanism. Evaluation on the held-out test set with verified ground truth demonstrates excellent segmentation performance (fovea IoU = 0.812, F1 = 0.894, AED = 4.06 pixels). To demonstrate the efficacy of our synthesis strategy, our GEV-based augmentation technique achieves a detection rate of 98.4% compared to 59.0% for baseline geometric augmentation (paired t-test: t = 8.536, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.093). Cross-dataset evaluation on REFUGE, MESSIDOR, and ARIA demonstrates competitive localization performance, achieving state-of-the-art Average Euclidean Distance on REFUGE (22.46 ± 18.73 pixels) and MESSIDOR (6.52 ± 5.89 pixels) with robust generalization across diverse imaging protocols. These results establish that explicit anatomical context, rather than mere model complexity, is key to accurate fovea segmentation, offering a robust paradigm for medical image analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.