ArticleScientific reports2026
Predicting DNA damage yields and assessing beam quality for protons and carbon ions using a DBSCAN algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modeling radiation-induced DNA damage is essential for understanding the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of ionizing radiation. This study presents a simplified framework using the density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) algorithm and using simulated physical track structures to characterize DNA damage induced by 0.5-200 MeV protons. The model assumed that (i) energy deposition ≥ 17.5 eV induced DNA damage, (ii) at least two damage points within a distance ε formed a cluster, (iii) isolated damage points were treated as noises, and (iv) the cluster-to-noise ratio corresponded to the double strand break (DSB)-to-single strand break (SSB) yield ratio. From the clustering output, a new beam quality metric called Quality of Beam (QoB; clusters per particle per µm) and its normalized form (clusters per keV of deposited energy) were defined. For protons, normalized QoB exhibited a strong linear correlation with DSB yields, enabling direct estimation of DSB and SSB yields using a single conversion factor. Applying the same framework and model parameters to carbon ions revealed a similar linear relationship between normalized QoB and DSB yields up to LET values of 200 keV µm⁻¹, beyond which the overkill effect emerged. The normalized QoB qualitatively reproduced RBE-LET trends and offered a biologically meaningful alternative to conventional metrics such as LET. Compared to full water radiolysis modeling, the DBSCAN framework was computationally efficient and provided a robust method for assessing ion beam quality and predicting DNA damage yields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.