ArticleScientific reports2026
Enhancing low-cost sensor performance for THD monitoring in smart meters using AI algorithms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research addresses the challenge of accurately measuring total harmonic distortion (THD) in smart meters, where traditional methods, such as FFT-based estimation, often fail to maintain high accuracy, especially when using low-cost sensors. The primary objective is to evaluate the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to improve THD estimation despite the limitations of economic sensor technology. To achieve this, the study employs a range of AI models, including AdaBoost, Random Forest, Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), utilizing data initially gathered from high-resolution sensors, which provide accurate reference measurements. Lower-resolution data were then extracted to simulate the performance of economic sensors, which typically offer less precise measurements. Among the AI models tested, AdaBoost consistently outperformed the others in terms of accuracy. In contrast, traditional FFT methods exhibited substantial performance degradation, particularly with low-cost sensors. By applying artificial intelligence, a trained model was developed, where inputs from economic sensors are processed to yield outputs that closely approximate those of high-precision sensors. The results confirm that integrating AI algorithms, especially AdaBoost, improves the performance of low-cost sensors, enabling them to achieve results comparable to high-precision, expensive sensors. This breakthrough not only provides a scalable and cost-effective solution for power quality analysis but also facilitates the development of affordable, high-quality sensors that can be deployed in smart meters without compromising measurement accuracy. The results were also experimentally confirmed in real-world scenarios, further validating the effectiveness of the AI-enhanced approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.