ArticleScientific reports2026
Assessing the hygienic disposal of patient stools among health workers at the Sunyani teaching hospital, Ghana.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improper hygienic disposal of patient stools in healthcare settings presents considerable dangers to infection management and the well-being of healthcare personnel, patients, and the local community. Although health workers play an essential role in ensuring proper sanitation and preventing infections, investigations have revealed shortcomings in adherence to stool disposal protocols in numerous healthcare environments, especially in low- and middle-income nations such as Ghana. The study therefore assessed the hygienic disposal of patient stools among health workers at the Sunyani Teaching Hospital. A descriptive cross-sectional study design was employed which allowed for association assessment but not causal inference. 315 participants were selected using stratified random sampling. Study participants were health workers. Respondents had surprisingly lower knowledge level on health hazards associated with improper disposal of patient stool (53.7%) and Moderate adherence level (77.8%) to hygienically dispose patient stool. Factors such as knowledge level, Training, resource availability, workload, Personal Risk Perception, Motivation and Attitude were found to be associated with low adherence level with p-values less than 0.05. Respondents demonstrated limited understanding of infection hazards but showed moderate adherence, largely influenced by institutional enforcement and available resources. The study concludes that while adherence to hygienic stool disposal was largely moderate, significant knowledge gaps remain that require targeted interventions. Improving continuous training, supervision and supply of disposal materials could enhance sustained compliance among healthcare workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.