ArticleScientific reports2026
Using machine learning algorithms to study the relationship between meteorological conditions and air quality parameters.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Air quality degradation poses significant risks to human health and ecosystems, particularly in rapidly urbanizing and industrialized arid regions. Meteorological conditions strongly influence the formation, transport, and dispersion of air pollutants, yet their relationships are highly nonlinear and difficult to quantify using conventional statistical approaches. This study investigates the influence of meteorological parameters on key air pollutants in the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia using machine learning techniques. Five years of observational data (2017–2021), including temperature, humidity, wind speed, wind direction, dew point, and atmospheric pressure, were analyzed alongside concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulate matter (PM10). Four machine learning algorithms including Neural Networks (NN), Decision Trees (DT), Random Forests (RF), and Gradient Boosting (GB) were evaluated using standard performance metrics; mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and the coefficient of determination (R2). The results indicate that meteorological parameters exert pollutant-specific influences. The GB model achieved the highest predictive accuracy for NO2 (R2 ≈ 0.83), highlighting the dominant role of humidity, dew point, and seasonal variation. Moderate predictive performance was observed for CO (R2 ≈ 0.46), suggesting a combined influence of meteorology and emission-driven processes. In contrast, PM10 exhibited weak correlations with meteorological variables, reflecting the dominance of episodic dust events and non-meteorological factors in arid environments. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of ensemble machine learning models in capturing nonlinear meteorological-pollutant relationships. The study provides valuable insights for air quality forecasting and supports data-driven environmental management in arid and semi-arid regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.