Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41735401›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Switching on the behavioral and neural rhythmicity to retrieve memories when the number of retained items exceeds four.

Takuya Ideriha, Junichi Ushiyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Takuya IderihaGraduate School of Media and Governance, Keio University, Fujisawa, Kanagawa, Japan. ide3.ko@keio.jp.
Junichi UshiyamaFaculty of Environment and Information Studies, Keio University, Fujisawa, Kanagawa, Japan. ushiyama@sfc.keio.ac.jp.

Funding

Japan Science and Technology Agency JPMJSP2123Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 24K02845
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Does our nervous system rely on the same neural mechanism for memory retrieval across all contexts? Here, we report an intriguing phenomenon where the nervous system "switches on" behavioral and neural rhythms under specific conditions, such as when the number of items being learned concurrently exceeds four. In our experiments, participants repeatedly learned and retrieved 2, 3, 4, or 5 color-letter pairs. Analyses of hundreds of reaction times revealed a significant tendency for memory recall to occur at discrete timings corresponding to theta-alpha (4-13 Hz) cycles in the 5-pair condition, while no such behavioral rhythmicity was observed in the 2, 3, and 4-pair conditions. The behavioral rhythmicity showed a clear increasing trend as the trials progressed. This rhythmicity was more prominent when recalling a different item from the immediate previous trial. Analyses of electroencephalographic (EEG) data also revealed an increased cue-locked neural theta-alpha rhythm in the 5-pair condition. Interestingly, the behavioral and EEG rhythms exhibited distinct characteristics, suggesting they each visualize different aspects of the underlying neural rhythm. Our results indicate that our nervous system adaptively engages a neural rhythm, as if switching it on, to achieve memory retrieval in specific contexts.

Indexed as

BrainMemoryMental RecallElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeTheta RhythmBehavioral fluctuationEvent-related potentialsMagical numberNeural oscillationWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID41735401
PMCPMC13031271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.