ArticleScientific reports2026
Explainable active reinforcement deep learning improves lung cancer detection from CT images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Explainable Split-Learning-Based Framework for Accurate Pulmonary Nodule Classification.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer remains a global health challenge that requires early and accurate diagnosis through medical imaging analysis. This study introduces ARXAF-Net framework which integrates Active Reinforcement deep leaning with strategic feature engineering, selection, advanced classification techniques with Explainable AI. Firstly, The ARXAF-Net framework overcomes the challenges of labeled dataset limitation by leveraging active reinforcement learning where the model achieves a remarkable 99.0% training accuracy using reinforcement learning. After that, Traditional feature extraction techniques, including GLCM and LBP, are combined with CNN with attention fusion model features, forming comprehensive vectors. Advanced techniques pinpoint essential characteristics for classification. The experiments conducted on a dataset comprising 30,020 CT images categorized into two classes—15,010 non-cancer and 15,010 cancer—demonstrate that CNN models employing attention fusion with traditional feature extraction achieve remarkable consistency, reaching a testing accuracy of 99%. Basic CNN models with traditional feature extraction, following normalization, display commendable performance, nearing an accuracy of 95%. Additionally, integrating explainable AI (XAI) into the performance frameworks significantly enhances the outcomes by incorporating feedback from radiologists. This research offers valuable insights into the optimal combinations of preprocessing, feature engineering/selection, and classification algorithms aimed at maximizing lung cancer detection efficacy. It also recognizes the trade-offs between accuracy and efficiency when merging deep and traditional features, highlighting the importance of careful feature selection. Moreover, addressing the challenges in this integration and investigating hyper-parameter tuning for machine learning models may present avenues for future improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.