ArticleScientific reports2026
Producer organizations, productivity and sustainable intensification practices in oil palm production.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oil palm production is expanding in traditional farming and forested areas, especially in West and Central Africa around the Congo Forest Basin and mostly characterized by declining yields and yield gaps. Due to typically non-binding land access, independent producers tend to prioritize extensification over intensification, which has negative environmental consequences. Sustainable intensification (SI) of smallholder production is a guiding paradigm that aims to increase yields while minimizing negative environmental impacts. In this study, we examine the relationship between producer organizations (POs), sustainable intensification practices (SIPs), namely mulching and intercropping, and oil palm yields in Cameroon. We estimate actual and counterfactual associations between POs, SIPs, production, and yields, drawing on farm- and household-level data collected through surveys and interviews with village chiefs and reference farmers. Empirically, we employ various regression techniques, including ordinary least squares, doubly robust estimators, instrumental variable estimators, recursive bivariate probit models, and switching regressions. Our findings reveal a positive association between POs and oil palm production and yields. The actual-counterfactual analysis demonstrates that POs not only benefit their members in terms of yield gains but also have the potential to benefit non-members if they were to join POs. Furthermore, POs are positively associated with the adoption of mulching and intercropping. Our results show distinct insights by gender when households are analyzed separately. We also find complementary evidence that PO membership is significantly associated with behavioral factors such as perceived self-efficacy, locus of control, hope and risk preference, suggesting that POs are a platform that shape behavioral conditions relevant for sustainable intensification and productivity. Overall, our study highlights the potential of POs as entry points for facilitating the adoption of SIPs and stimulating productivity increases in smallholder oil palm systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.