ArticleScientific reports2026
Premature mortality from cardio-cerebrovascular diseases in Bogotá an analytical machine learning approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Premature mortality from cardio-cerebrovascular diseases represents an increasing burden on health systems, particularly in urban contexts across Latin America. This study analyzes mortality records in Bogotá from 2010 to 2022 via descriptive analysis, time series, and machine learning models. It includes deaths among individuals aged over 30, classified as premature or nonpremature based on a 75-year threshold1. Supervised models were trained using sociodemographic, insurance-related, and underlying cause-of-death variables, and their performance was evaluated via standard metrics. The random forest model showed the best overall performance, with educational level, insurance scheme, and place of death emerging as the main predictors. Additionally, separate models were developed for diagnostic groups (ischemic, cerebrovascular, hypertensive, and heart failure) and revealed differences in classification patterns. The model for ischemic heart disease achieved the highest AUC (0.69), followed by cerebrovascular (0.65), hypertensive (0.63), and heart failure (0.61). SHAP analysis highlighted the differential contribution of sociodemographic variables such as place of death, sex, educational level, and insurance scheme, with distinct patterns observed across causes of death. Trend analysis revealed a sustained increase in premature mortality, which increased during the pandemic period. These findings underscore the role of social determinants in premature cardiovascular deaths and highlight the potential of machine learning as a decision-support tool for public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.