ArticleScientific reports2026
Robust learning framework for a scalable remote monitoring of autonomic dysreflexia: use-case in spinal cord injury.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The autonomous nervous system (ANS) response in neurological disorders is a direct modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular health, however, difficulty in remote monitoring and objective assessment has made it underrepresented in preventive healthcare. Particularly, autonomic dysreflexia (AD) is a dangerous hypertensive emergency, potentially life-threatening in people with spinal cord injury (SCI), yet detection outside clinical settings remains reactive and episodic. This study presents an interpretable and scalable framework for creating a digital biomarker from multimodal wearables in data scarcity through vital sign attribution analysis in multiple body locations, evaluated with 27 subjects undergoing clinical examination with objective blood pressure measurements. Our framework learns from diverse biosignals-lectrocardiography (ECG), photoplethysmography (PPG), bioimpedance, skin temperature, heart rate, and respiratory rate-proving robustness to sensor failure and a pathway to remote monitoring. This study identified heart rate and ECG as dominant predictors, with PPG providing complementary value, under simulated single-modality failure or noisy channels. This work advances a feasible path to equitable, remote monitoring of the ANS response, reducing dependence on intermittent BP measurements and enabling earlier intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.