ArticleScientific reports2026
An evaluation of machine learning for soil analysis in internet of things-enabled smart farming.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soil plays a foundational role in sustaining agricultural productivity and ecological stability, yet traditional soil analysis methods remain labour-intensive, slow, and often inadequate for real-time decision-making in modern precision agriculture. With the rise of Agriculture 4.0, machine learning (ML) and Internet of Things (IoT) technologies offer transformative potential for accurate, scalable, and data-driven soil assessment. Current research in this domain remains relatively fragmented, with a lack of clarity in models, sensing methodologies, and algorithmic strategies that produce the highest accuracy and operational value across diverse agricultural contexts. To address this gap, this research used a PRISMA-guided systematic literature review to systematically examine contemporary machine learning (ML) and IoT-based soil analysis methodologies. The review utilized sophisticated search queries across databases: Scopus, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, for identifying studies published between 2019 and 2024. After rigorous screening that involved removing duplication and full-text assessment of the retrieved entries, 77 high-quality articles were identified that met the eligibility criteria from an initial set of 180 entries. Data extraction was performed under descriptive and thematic synthesis, thereby allowing the comparative evaluation of supervised and unsupervised learning models, IoT sensing frameworks, soil parameters, dataset characteristics, evaluation metrics, and deployment constraints. Comparative analysis revealed that the use of supervised models, such as Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), and deep ensembles, produces higher accuracy in the classification of soil quality, fertility, pH, and nutrient levels, especially in structured datasets like the Soil Fertility Dataset. IoT-based sensing systems significantly improve the reliability of predictions by offering continuous and detailed measurements of soil moisture, nutrient status, and environmental conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.