Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41735237›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026

ChemTorch: A Deep Learning Framework for Benchmarking and Developing Chemical Reaction Property Prediction Models.

Jasper De Landsheere, Anton Zamyatin, Johannes Karwounopoulos, Esther Heid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jasper De LandsheereInstitute of Materials Chemistry, TU Wien, Vienna 1060, Austria.
Anton ZamyatinInstitute of Materials Chemistry, TU Wien, Vienna 1060, Austria.
Johannes KarwounopoulosInstitute of Materials Chemistry, TU Wien, Vienna 1060, Austria.
Esther HeidInstitute of Materials Chemistry, TU Wien, Vienna 1060, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8404-6596

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modeling of chemical reactions is essential for understanding kinetic mechanisms and predicting possible outcomes of reacting systems. Quantum mechanical calculations are accurate but often prohibitively expensive. Deep learning has emerged as a faster alternative, but progress is slowed by a fragmented software ecosystem that hinders reuse, fair comparison, and reproducibility. We present ChemTorch, an open-source framework that streamlines model development, experimentation, hyperparameter tuning, and benchmarking through modular pipelines, standardized configuration, and built-in data splitters for in- and out-of-distribution evaluation. We envision ChemTorch as a foundation for community-driven method development and reproducible benchmarking in chemical reaction modeling. As a first step toward unified benchmarks, we compare four representative modalities for barrier-height prediction on the RDB7 data set, including fingerprint-, sequence-, graph-, and 3D-based approaches. Our results highlight clear advantages of structurally informed models and sharp performance drops under out-of-distribution conditions, highlighting the importance of rigorous benchmarking.

Indexed as

Deep LearningModels, ChemicalBenchmarkingSoftware

Identifiers

PMID41735237
PMCPMC12977048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.