Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41735226›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of haematology2026

Navigating through uncertainty-Experience from the UK national VEXAS MDT.

Daniel Pietsch, Austin Kulasekararaj, Sinisa Savic, VEXNET‐UK MDT

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel PietschDepartment of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Austin KulasekararajHaematology Department, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3180-3570
Sinisa SavicDepartment of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
VEXNET‐UK MDT

Funding

Kennedy Trust for Rheumatology ResearchLeeds Biomedical Research Centre NIHR203331Medical Research Centre MR/Y011945/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe the establishment, structure and influence of the United Kingdom national multidisciplinary team (MDT) for vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic (VEXAS) syndrome and to assess its clinical outputs and perceived value among participating clinicians. All patients discussed at the national VEXAS MDT between June 2024 and May 2025 were included. Clinical information was extracted from standardised referral forms, and MDT recommendations were reviewed. An anonymised questionnaire evaluated clinicians' experience of the MDT. Forty-two patients from 27 centres were reviewed; 36 (85.7%) had confirmed VEXAS syndrome and 6 had VEXAS-like disease. Almost all were male (41/42), with a median age of 70 years. Before MDT review, 62% received corticosteroid monotherapy. MDT recommendations favoured steroid-sparing strategies, with marked increases in the use of azacitidine (1-22 patients) and tocilizumab (5-15 patients), alongside reduced use of conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Four patients were referred for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Twenty of 43 MDT members completed the survey, reporting greater confidence in managing VEXAS and valuing the MDT's educational and collaborative benefits. The national VEXAS MDT supported evidence-informed, multidisciplinary decision-making, promoted more targeted therapy and strengthened clinical confidence and collaboration in the absence of formal treatment guidelines.

Indexed as

Patient Care TeamAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyelodysplastic SyndromesSkin Diseases, GeneticSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdomazacitidinecorticosteroidshaematologymultidisciplinary teamrheumatologyUBA1VEXAS syndrome

Identifiers

PMID41735226
PMCPMC13071473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.