ArticleBritish journal of haematology2026
Navigating through uncertainty-Experience from the UK national VEXAS MDT.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Therapeutic Outcomes in VEXAS Syndrome: A Multicenter Comparative Cohort of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Hypomethylating Agents.American journal of hematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this study was to describe the establishment, structure and influence of the United Kingdom national multidisciplinary team (MDT) for vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic (VEXAS) syndrome and to assess its clinical outputs and perceived value among participating clinicians. All patients discussed at the national VEXAS MDT between June 2024 and May 2025 were included. Clinical information was extracted from standardised referral forms, and MDT recommendations were reviewed. An anonymised questionnaire evaluated clinicians' experience of the MDT. Forty-two patients from 27 centres were reviewed; 36 (85.7%) had confirmed VEXAS syndrome and 6 had VEXAS-like disease. Almost all were male (41/42), with a median age of 70 years. Before MDT review, 62% received corticosteroid monotherapy. MDT recommendations favoured steroid-sparing strategies, with marked increases in the use of azacitidine (1-22 patients) and tocilizumab (5-15 patients), alongside reduced use of conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Four patients were referred for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Twenty of 43 MDT members completed the survey, reporting greater confidence in managing VEXAS and valuing the MDT's educational and collaborative benefits. The national VEXAS MDT supported evidence-informed, multidisciplinary decision-making, promoted more targeted therapy and strengthened clinical confidence and collaboration in the absence of formal treatment guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.