ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026
Spinal Processing of Spatiotemporally Diverse Tactile Stimuli: Computational Insights into Allodynia and Spinal Cord Stimulation.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Weakening of synaptic inhibition in the spinal dorsal horn (SDH) contributes to mechanical allodynia after peripheral nerve pathology. Restoring inhibition can alleviate allodynia, whereas weakening it is sufficient to induce allodynia and spontaneous pain in uninjured conditions. Disinhibition is known to un-gate nociceptive polysynaptic spinal circuits, but why allodynia is predominantly evoked by certain touch stimuli remains unclear. To address this, we incorporated receptive fields (RFs) into a computational model of the SDH to study the processing of stimuli with different spatiotemporal features. Our model reveals that broad stimuli normally suppress spinal output by engaging inhibition from the RF's inhibitory surround, but previously subliminal excitation can be engaged when inhibition is compromised, fundamentally altering excitatory-inhibitory balance. The efficacy of spinal inhibition also depends on the input's temporal pattern, especially since excitatory and inhibitory spinal neurons are preferentially sensitive to synchronous and asynchronous input, respectively. Furthermore, spikes driven by synchronous input are resistant to feedforward inhibition. This combination of effects may explain why broad dynamic touch (e.g., brush) evokes more allodynia than punctate static touch. On the other hand, asynchronous and spatially disordered input like that evoked by kilohertz-frequency spinal cord stimulation was found to preferentially activate inhibitory neurons, thus reducing allodynia. Overall, our results suggest how spatial and temporal stimulus features impact the flow of sensory input through disinhibited spinal circuits. Our results show how quantitative computational models can connect injury-induced molecular changes to clinically relevant sensory effects by revealing nonintuitive processes occurring at the cellular and circuit levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.