Trial reportPrimary health care research & development2026
Free cessation aids and enhanced support for smoking cessation in disadvantaged smokers: a qualitative study of patient and provider insights.
Trial report in Primary health care research & development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo explore facilitators and barriers to smoking cessation among smokers experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage, from the perspectives of patients and healthcare providers (HP) participating in the STOP randomized controlled trial (STOP-RCT).
backgroundSmoking remains disproportionately prevalent among socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals, contributing to significant health disparities. The STOP-RCT evaluates a preference-based smoking cessation intervention offering free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and e-cigarettes to disadvantaged smokers.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted involving semi-structured interviews with 14 participants and 5 HP from the STOP-RCT. Data collection explored participants' smoking cessation experiences, perceptions of the intervention, the quitting process, and the factors that influence cessation. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the transcribed data. Themes were categorized into structural and individual factors, refined iteratively, and supported by illustrative quotes.
findingsFour key facilitators were identified: (1) longer consultations enabling tailored support; (2) regular follow-up promoting patient engagement; (3) immediate and free access to NRT and carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring, reducing financial and practical barriers while providing feedback; and (4) shared decision-making, strengthening trust and improving the fit of support. These findings highlight the importance of addressing both treatment approach (contextual) and interpersonal factors for this population. Considering these elements may help adapt cessation programmes to the specific difficulties and needs of patients with low socioeconomic position, thereby reinforcing treatment adherence and improving effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.