ArticleFamily medicine and community health2026
Development and psychometric properties of the 'Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC) tool' for people with chronic heart failure (CHF): a mixed methods approach.
Article in Family medicine and community health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop a chronic heart failure (CHF) module for the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC) tool and evaluate its psychometric properties.
designMixed methods study.
settingThe study was conducted in the Netherlands.
participantsHealthcare providers (ie, general practitioners (GPs), practice nurses, cardiologists, heart failure nurse practitioners, heart failure specialist nurses) and patients with CHF were involved in the developmental phase. In the psychometric evaluation, patients with CHF were included.
resultsThe ABCC-CHF module comprised 26 items across CHF-specific domains, accompanied by associated advice. It demonstrated high convergent validity with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) (97%) and successfully differentiated most known-groups. Internal consistency yielded a Cronbach's α of 0.92 for the total scale, while test-retest reliability showed an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.97.
conclusionThe CHF-specific module is developed and validated. It aims to integrate disease burden into routine healthcare, supporting person-centred care for people with CHF and multimorbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.