ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2026
Longitudinal multisource clinical model for early lung cancer risk stratification and screening.
Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesLung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with poor prognosis largely due to late-stage diagnosis. Current screening methods such as low-dose CT face accessibility and cost barriers in resource-limited settings. This study develops a lightweight multichannel convolutional neural network for lung cancer screening support through longitudinal risk stratification using routine pre-diagnostic healthcare data.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, comprising 99 615 individuals (575 lung cancer cases; 99 040 non-cancer controls). Diagnostic codes, medication records and medical orders within a 36-month observation window were extracted. Log-likelihood ratio feature selection was implemented to reduce dimensionality, achieving 99.8% reduction in computational requirements while retaining clinical relevance. A multichannel Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architecture was designed to process these heterogeneous data modalities simultaneously.
resultsThe proposed method achieved an F₁-score of 0.5738, precision of 0.7149, Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) of 0.8316 and Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC) of 0.1617, outperforming baseline methods in precision and F₁-score. Ablation studies confirmed that medical orders provide primary predictive value, while medication features contribute limited discriminative signal in the pre-diagnostic phase. SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis revealed that routine healthcare utilisation patterns, rather than cancer-specific features, drive risk stratification. DISCUSSION: The lightweight architecture enables deployment in resource-constrained clinical environments while maintaining robust performance, offering potential as a preliminary screening tool to identify high-risk individuals for further diagnostic examination.
conclusionEfficient deep learning models using routine clinical data can facilitate lung cancer risk stratification and screening, providing a scalable solution for clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.