Trial reportInternational wound journal2026
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial.
Trial report in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Indications, therapeutic modalities and clinical outcomes of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in Italy, the ITA-OTI Study: a multicentre prospective observational study.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Article
- Effect of platelet-rich fibrin gel combined with alginate dressing on healing of active venous leg ulcers: a randomized clinical trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic venous leg ulcers (CVLUs) affect 1%-3% of adults. Standard compression therapy achieves healing in only 40%-70% of cases at 24 weeks. Evidence for hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy remains controversial, with limited sham-controlled trials. To evaluate whether adjunctive HBO improves healing of refractory CVLUs compared to standard care alone. Single-centre, open-label randomised trial of 80 adults with CVLUs that persisted > 3 months despite standard care (defined as < 30% area reduction after 4 weeks of compression therapy). All consecutive eligible patients were randomised to HBO (20 sessions at 2.4 ATA, 90 min) plus standard care (n = 40) or standard care alone (n = 40). Primary outcome: percentage ulcer area reduction at day 30. Blinded assessors measured wounds, though participants knew their treatment allocation. HBO group had greater area reduction (62.1% ± 22.1% vs. 41.7% ± 21.5%; mean difference 20.4%, 95% CI: 10.1-30.7, p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.95). Complete healing at 90 days occurred in 62.5% vs. 30.0% (NNT = 3). TcPO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.