Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41734754›Full record

ArticleObstetrics & gynecology science2026

Association between hysterectomy and dementia risk in Korean women aged 40-59: a nationwide retrospective cohort study.

Sang-Hee Yoon, Jin-Sung Yuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sang-Hee YoonDepartment of a and Gynecology, Research Institute of Medical Science, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jin-Sung YukDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sanggye Paik Hospital, School of Medicine, Inje University, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

Inje University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether hysterectomy for benign diseases is associated with the risk of dementia in middle-aged women.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database (2002-2020). Women aged 40-59 years who underwent hysterectomy for benign indications (n=16,818) were propensity score-matched (1:1) to controls who had not received hysterectomy. Subjects were followed up until the diagnosis of dementia, death, or the end of the study period (2020). Dementia (all types), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and vascular dementia (VaD) were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision codes. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dementia associated with hysterectomy.

resultsMedian follow-up was 11.4 years. Dementia occurred in 302 (1.8%) women who did not undergo hysterectomy and 257 (1.5%) women who underwent hysterectomy (P=0.061). Cox analysis revealed that hysterectomy was not significantly associated with all-cause dementia (HR, 0.865; 95% CI, 0.724-1.033), with a non-significant trend towards reduced risk. Subgroup analysis also failed to identify any significant association; AD (HR, 0.696; 95% CI, 0.463-1.048) and VaD (HR, 0.625; 95% CI, 0.284-1.377) were not significantly associated with an increased hazard.

conclusionIn this large Korean cohort, hysterectomy for benign diseases in women aged 40-59 years was not associated with a significant change in the subsequent risk of dementia. Collectively, our results indicate that hysterectomy was not associated with an increased incidence of dementia, including in analyses stratified by adnexal surgery.

Indexed as

Cohort studiesDementiaHysterectomy

Identifiers

PMID41734754
PMCPMC13017170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.