Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41734487›Full record

ReviewVision research2026

Filter, Detector, Predictor: The expanding repertoire of retinal computation in vertebrates.

Michael B Manookin, Fred Rieke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vision research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael B ManookinDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Vision Science Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: manookin@uw.edu.
Fred RiekeVision Science Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Neurobiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Vision Research CoreP30EY001730 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Jay Neitz · 1985 to 2026
$23.5M
Unique physiological properties of novel ganglion cell types in primate retinaR01EY029247 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI EDUARDO CHICHILNISKY, Michael B Manookin · 2018 to 2026
$4.7M
Function, diversity, and circuitry of parallel retinal ganglion cell pathwaysR01EY027323 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Michael B Manookin · 2018 to 2026
$3.9M
Mechanisms controlling retinal responses to natural stimuliR01EY028542 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FREDERICK M RIEKE · 2018 to 2026
$3.5M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001730NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027323NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028542NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primate retina has traditionally been viewed as a simple, high-resolution encoding stage, performing basic spatial, temporal, and chromatic filtering before transmitting information to cortical areas for higher-level processing. This perspective, formalized in the classical three-channel model, emphasizes three dominant ganglion cell pathways: parasol cells for achromatic signals, midget cells for red-green opponency and spatial detail, and small bistratified cells for blue-yellow signals. However, recent evidence challenges this view, showing that these pathways play more complex and nuanced roles than previously assumed. In non-primate species, the retina is now recognized as a site of substantial computation, performing nonlinear processing, motion analysis, and feature extraction. Emerging data suggest that similar computational complexity exists in the primate retina but has been underappreciated due to sampling biases and the use of overly simplistic stimuli. Anatomical and physiological studies indicate that the primate retina contains at least 20-30 distinct ganglion cell types, many exhibiting feature selectivity analogous to that seen in rodents, rabbits, and amphibians. In this review, we critically examine the classical model of primate retinal processing, its historical foundations, and its limitations. We highlight recent evidence revealing a more complex and diverse primate retinal output and discuss how conserved and primate-specific circuits contribute to early visual computations. Together, these findings reposition the primate retina as an active computational structure, not merely a simple front-end encoder.

Indexed as

RetinaRetinal Ganglion CellsVertebratesAnimalsHumansModels, NeurologicalPrimatesVisual PathwaysRetinal computationRetinal evolutionVisual processing

Identifiers

PMID41734487
PMCPMC13005736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.