ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Pregnant women's and health workers' perceptions and experiences on the Rwandan ANC digital module intervention at selected health centres.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As part of the New Antenatal Care Model for Africa and India (NAMAI) study, Rwanda implemented a digital module, in line with national digital health strategies, and the WHO SMART guideline framework. The purpose of this NAMAI study was to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of implementing an updated national Antenatal Care (ANC) service package and the use of a digital tool to support and improve quality service provision. A qualitative component was conducted to explore the experiences of health workers and pregnant women on the implementation of the Rwandan digital ANC module intervention in study facilities. This qualitative study was conducted in 14 health centres in Nyanza and Nyagatare districts. A total of 13 heads of health centres and 14 nurses/midwives providing ANC services participated in Key Informant Interviews (KIIs). In addition, 10 Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were conducted, each composed of seven to nine pregnant women. Data were collected in December 2024 using KII and FGD guides. All KIIs and FGDs were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and translated into English. Transcripts were analyzed employing using inductive thematic content analysis techniques with Atlas.ti Version 8. The Rwandan ANC digital module intervention was perceived to enhance tracking and follow up, improve data storage and reduce risk of record loss, simplify data analysis and reporting, and provide reminder notifications. However, some implementation challenges were highlighted, including slow performance of the digital tool, inadequate supervision, and increased workload due to the use of concurrent paper and digital tools. Despite the perceived benefits of the Rwandan digital ANC module intervention, the study identified some challenges that may hinder its effective implementation. To optimize the delivery of ANC services through this digital tool and inform future scale-up, it is essential to address the mentioned challenges.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.